Sunday, November 2, 2014

Not Payin' for Playin'

A few years ago I mostly stopped doing "pay for play," meaning that I don't cough up jury fees anymore. Of course there are exceptions--sometimes I'll empathize with a start-up gallery's need for cash flow (hey, support the arts!), or I'll want to support a gallery's first venture into showing collage (great that you're taking a risk on this exciting medium! here's my money!). Then I'll write the check. I see these more as charitable contributions than as competitions for wall space and if my work winds up fitting into the mix of the curation, that's great. If not, that's fine, too. 

If I can't view the jurying fee as a charitable contribution for whatever reason, I no longer support the act of paying somebody to judge my work. I find that I react particularly badly to the personalized invitations from gallery owners or curators that lavishly compliment my work and then invite me to submit my work for consideration, accompanied, of course, by jurying fees. I suppose the currency that's being traded here is flattery (and, of course, "exposure," if the work is accepted), but when I get these sorts of communications, I can't help but feel like a cash cow. Moo.

By contrast, I really don't object to reasonable hanging fees. We all run on short margins, and I really do like to support the arts. But when you pay a hanging fee, you are getting value in return for your expenditure--your work is being displayed. It seems win-win all around.

Recently I received an invitation to submit these three pieces for consideration to an exhibition:

"one blue eye" 2014
8x10 on recycled canvas board
Paper collage with mixed media (direct-paper-to-paper gel ink transfers, pencil, pen, acrylics, Lucite viewfinder)
"World Without End" 2014
8x10 on canvas boardPaper collage with mixed media (direct-paper-to-paper gel ink transfers, dye ink, rub-on letters, pencil, glaze, gold paint)

"DUCK" 2014
5 x 7 on canvas board
Paper collage with mixed media (direct-paper-to-paper gel ink transfers, dye ink), beeswax finish
While my typical routine in this situation has been to send back a polite little note expressing my deepest appreciation and promising to consider the kind invitation to write a check (and then promptly sending the "opportunity" into the junk file), this time I decided to respond more frankly.

Here, instead, is what I wrote:

Thanks so much for your enthusiastic support of my work in mixed-media collage. I'm flattered that you'd consider displaying my work in your upcoming show. Feel free to view my work on my website and let me know which pieces would best fit within your curatorial vision. I'm assuming that since you approached me, and obviously know my work, that you'll be waiving your jury fee. If we wind up working together, I'd be happy to discuss an appropriate hanging fee, to support your and the gallery's endeavors, added to the gallery's usual sales commission.

We'll see how this works out.

Just sayin' no to "moo."


10 comments:

jani said...

i like your style, little missy!
:)
jani

tgarrett said...

This is a very thoughtful Post Laura. I so agree and Have stopped sending fees for shows. I have a show opening this Friday at a sweet Bistro here and I have sold better in these venues than I have in gallery shows- And my work gets seen by more people.

Laura Tringali Holmes said...

Thank ya kindly, Jani!

Laura Tringali Holmes said...

Thanks, tgarrett. Wish I could be at that show! I hope you have a great time and there's a solid stream of people to enjoy your wonderful work!

Sharmon Davidson said...

A great solution to the whole jury-fee dilemma! Your written response is brilliant; I'd be interested to know if there's any reaction on their part. I, too, have mostly stopped sending in applications for juried shows. Beyond the jurying fee, what's even worse is the cost of shipping the work to the exhibit venue and back!

I really enjoy seeing your work, and these three pieces are simply wonderful! Thanks for sharing them!

Barbara said...

Well put and i totally agree. Can't imagine the audacity of them choosing your works to be considered and then asking for a jury fee!
More of us artists need to step up like this.


Laura Tringali Holmes said...

Thanks, Sharmon--appreciate your kind words about my work! Yup, I'm with you on shipping--also a drag, especially if work doesn't sell and you have to coordinate a return trip. I'm interested to see if I'll get a response, too. I'd also love to hear from people who routinely pay the jurying fees--maybe there's a critical mass, as in, if you write enough checks and are juried into enough shows, perhaps eventually there are rewards either tangible or otherwise.

Laura Tringali Holmes said...

I know, Barbara--if it's just an open call you can choose to apply or not, but if it's a personalized invitation, a sort of pre-jurying, and then there's a check requested to allow you to swim in the general jury pool--well, it definitely puts a spin on things.

Torch Song Tango said...

Hi, Laura, I love your work and your site. And I especially love this sentiment (or lack of same). I was a journalist for many years, and can't count how many times I was invited to write for a journal of publication for free, with an insulting reassurance that I would get exposure and have a chance to grow with them. Having plenty of paying work, I felt I could afford to pass. I'm pretty sure they don't hand that line to their accountant, or the printers.

Keep up the good work!

Laura Tringali Holmes said...

Nice to hear from you Torch Song Tango...I'm also asked lots to comp writing/editing work and while I love to help make things grow, I think I've probably done my last pro bono. I don't go into Staples and ask them for a free pack of pencils, after all. Thanks for the kind words about my work--much appreciated!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...